Kamala Harris has been exposed by the most liberal major newspaper in America.
The New York Times simply had to admit the truth.
Kamala Harris committed a horrible act and now the New York Times revealed it to the world.
This latest news about Kamala Harris and the book she wrote is going to deliver yet another blow to her stumbling campaign.
She is already falling well behind in the polls and looks on track to not only lose the Electoral College but even the popular vote to Donald Trump.
Now she’s being accused of plagiarizing parts of her book and even the New York Times is going after her for this misdeed.
Like many politicians do, Harris published a book in 2019 to build publicity and name recognition for her political career.
However, it appears that portions of the book were lifted from other sources.
According to Breitbart, “The New York Times admitted Monday that Vice President Kamala Harris had plagiarized multiple passages in her 2009 book, Smart on Crime, but claimed that the copying was ‘not serious’ and a small portion of the whole book.”
“The plagiarism was exposed by conservative journalist Christopher Rufo, based on research by Dr. Stefan Weber, a world-renowned Austrian expert on plagiarism.”
“The Times reported that the plagiarism was real, but claimed that it was ‘not serious.’ The Times article is titled ‘Conservative Activist Seizes on Passages From Harris Book,’ with the sub-headline: ‘A report by Christopher Rufo says the Democratic presidential nominee copied five short passages for her 2009 book on crime. A plagiarism expert said the lapses were not serious,’” the article continues.
“Harris’s plagiarism apparently included lifting passages from Wikipedia, which is not considered a reliable source.”
“The Times commonly reports the act of omitting or deleting attribution for passages quoted from other sources as ‘plagiarism’ and not merely as ‘errors.’”
It’s clear that the Times still wants to protect Harris’s reputation, but the fact they were willing to admit plagiarism took place is notable.
In most cases, a media outlet with a political agenda would just not report on something that could be damaging to one of their preferred candidates.
Harris’s plagiarism, however, was so obvious that even the New York Times couldn’t look the other way.